If you live in another country, you may not know
that we in Canada are in the throes of
a federal election. I find election campaigns fascinating
in the same way as an accident on the highway - I
don't really want to see what might be there, but I
feel compelled to look!
The reason I bring this up is that
politicians are essentially professional communicators,
and there's one aspect of their technique
I feel we all need to understand.
It's the art of
propaganda - and the skill of recognizing it
when we hear it, whatever its source.
My online dictionary defines propaganda first as
"chiefly derogatory information, especially of a biased or
misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a
particular political cause or point of view."
Coming from all directions
It seems
to me that by that definition, propaganda comes
at us from all directions every day, and not just
from politicians. But let's use politicians to
illustrate how it works.
Consider this: one party leader makes a statement
about a subject of national interest. Do you tend to
believe it?
I think the answer depends on whether
he or she leads the party of your choice or one of
the others. The simple fact is, our perception of a
message is coloured by our opinion of the speaker.
Many years ago we had a charismatic leader in
Canada-I won't mention his name, but those of
my vintage can probably take an accurate guess
as to who I mean.
One day while watching him make
a speech, I suddenly realized I believed anything
that came out of his mouth - and that was a dangerous
thing. From that day on, I made a point of carefully
considering what he said to be sure I agreed with
the content, and was not just persuaded by his
personal style or my own bias.
This happens in business life as well. If you receive
a piece of news at work, or hear an unfounded rumour,
you are more likely to believe it if you admire the person
who tells you. If you don't, you may dismiss the
information as "gossip". But it's wise to listen carefully
to the song, and not just the singer.
Bandwagon effect
Have you noticed that politicians make frequent use
of what's known as the "bandwagon effect"?
Every
night on the news, we hear from one or more party
leaders that "Canadians want this" or "Canadians
want that" and therefore "Canadians will vote
for..." Hence the popularity of opinion polls. We are
supposed to think that if Canadians in general
want that, then we must want it too.
We may be too smart to be taken in by this old
political ploy-but we don't always recognize it
in other circumstances.
For
example, you are asked to contribute to a
charitable campaign in your office, and the memo
tells you that "last year 98% of our employees
contributed to this worthy cause". That may be
true, but it's a poor reason to hand over your money.
If you think it truly is a cause worthy of your
support, then by all means contribute-but not
just because everyone else is doing so.
It's a few years now since cellphones first came on
the scene. At first they were a novelty. Then they
became a bit of a joke.
Soon, though, people saw a certain
value in them and they became a practical
communication tool. Now, however, manufacturers
and others would have us believe they are
indispensable and we can't possibly operate in
the modern world without one.
That is propaganda.
And it's not true. We can manage just fine without
the constant contact created by a cellphone.
That's opinion too - mine. Of course, that may
not be true either.
You decide!